How To Fix Gi Joe Talking

Why everything costs just 100? Texts

LEE EXPLAINS WHY THE TEXT AND DEFENDS FREEDOM IDEA OF EACH. SEARCH IN TURN, DOS text defending determinism. (PHILOSOPHICAL)


Freedom, Sancho, is one of the most precious gifts that heaven gave men and with it can not match the treasures of the earth and the sea conceals, for freedom and for honor, can venture life and, on the contrary, captivity is the greatest evil that can befall men.

Miguel de Cervantes
Piece Don Quijote de la Mancha

PRISONER MAN LOOKING FOR YOUR CHILD

the "old" hache

When I was like you taught me the old
and caring teachers and myopic
freedom or death that was a redundancy
who could think in a country where presidents
went without capangas
the homeland or the tomb was another tautology
as the country worked well

in the fields and pastures in really did not know a horn jug

pobrecitos believed that freedom was just a word that death was acute serious or just plain lucky and prisons for a word antepenultimate
forgot to stress man was not exactly blame them but others hard and these claims
yes
how we
strung with clear verbal Republic idealized
how the cows and ranchers vidurria and how they sold us an army
taking his mate in the barracks
you do not always do what you want you can not always


why I'm here watching and by lying under that's why I can not despeinarte the broomrape
or help with the table of nine or acribillarte
to
balls You know that I had to choose other games that I played
and seriously
and played for example
thieves and robbers were police
and played for example, the hidden and if you discovered

kill you and I played the stain was blood
and cruse

few years even if you think you have to tell you the truth
to
not forget why you did not gave me electric shocks hidden that I almost burst
kidney
these swellings and wounds sores
your eyes look round

are hypnotized are very tough blows

boots in the face too much pain to get it too
hide torture for me to delete
but it is also good to know that or your old street whore like crazy which is a nice way to silence your old forgot all numbers (so I could not help in the tables) and therefore all
phones and the streets and eye color and hair and scars and what corner which bar what does house

stop and remember you

in your face
helped him to shut up is one thing to die of pain and other things
die of shame
so now you can ask me and especially

I can I answer you do not always do what he wants but has
right not to
which does not just cruse
Llorá
are clubs that men do not cry cry all

here snivelling cry watercress
screamed curse
it is better to mourn that betrayal
it is better to betray
mourn but remember Llorá





http://patriagrande.net/uruguay/mario.benedetti/poemas/hombre.preso.que.mira Mario Benedetti . a.su. Hijo.htm


All men think about free will. For all trials that fall on the planned actions as they should occur even if they have not happened. However, this freedom is not a concept of experience, and can not be, because it stays forever, even though experience shows the opposite of those things which, under the assumption of freedom, are represented as necessary. On the other hand, is equally necessary that everything that happens is inevitably determined by natural laws, and this need is also not a natural concept of experience, precisely because it lies in the concept of necessity and, therefore, a priori knowledge. But this concept of nature is confirmed by experience and must inevitably be of course, if it be possible experience, that is, knowledge of the objects of the senses, made according to universal laws. Therefore freedom is only an idea of \u200b\u200breason, objective reality which is itself questionable, the nature, however, is a concept that demonstrates understanding, and necessarily must demonstrate its reality in examples of experience. From this arises, therefore, a dialectic of reason, because, in respect of the will, freedom attached to it seems to contradict the natural necessity, and in such a crossroads, the reason, from the standpoint of speculative is the road of physical necessity much more plain and easy that freedom, but from the practical point of view is the path of freedom the only one which allows the use of reason in our actions and omissions by which more subtle or philosophy or common reason of man can never exclude freedom. There is therefore assumed that between freedom and natural necessity of one and the same actions there is no real human contradiction, because it can not be deleted or the concept of nature and the concept of freedom.

Immanuel Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Chapter Three (Mare Nostrum Communication. Translation: Manuel García Morente)

human being and freedom
1.
The study will make it possible, on the contrary, further ahead in the understanding of freedom. So what demands our attention above all is that if the will must be autonomous, it is impossible to consider it as a given psychic event, ie, in-si. I could not belong to the category of "states of consciousness" as defined by the psychologist. In this as in all other cases we found that the state of consciousness is a mere idol of positive psychology. The will is necessarily negative and power of nihilation, if it must be released. But then why do not we already reserve autonomy. Poorly conceived, in fact, these holes nihilation and volitions that would arise in the plot, otherwise dense and full of passion and pathos in general. If the will is nihilation, it must all be psychic as well. Moreover, - and will return soon about it - where does it gets the "fact" of passion or the sheer desire not niihilízadores? Does Passion is not primarily project and company, does not precisely an intolerable state of affairs, and is not required for this very reason to take distance from that state and nihilizarlo isolating and considering in light of an end ie a non-being? And the passion does not have its own purposes, which are recognized at the very moment that she set them as non-existent? And if the nihilation is precisely the essence of freedom, how to deny autonomy to the passions to give the will?

Being and Nothingness, Part IV. Cap. I, l Sartre

Wedding Sayings For Koozies Funny

Freedom Super Mario Benedetti

Today

dead
Mario Benedetti, a great poet and a great person, who fought for their ideals to the end and bequeathed to humanity a myriad of beautiful stories and poems that might one day learn to enjoy. I put one in his memory. Do not have to do volunteer work. Simply read it if you want.


Say NO GOD

you definitely walk away into the well of oblivion you prefer,
but the best part of your space,
really the only constant in your space,
will always remain in me, aching,
persuaded, frustrated, silent
me your heart will be inert and substantially
your heart with a unique promise in me
sobreviviéndote
am entirely alone.
After that round and effective pain, patiently
sour, invincible tenderness, and no matter
use your unbearable absence
not dare to ask me if you fit
as always in a word.
The truth is that now you're not in my night
heartbreakingly
identical to the others that repeated searching for you, around you.
There is only an echo of my voice
hopeless as a child, that he did not know. Now
useless fear, shame
have no prayer to bite,
no faith to hammer nails,
not have anything else that night, knowing that God
dies, slips,
God back with folded arms,
with closed lips, with the fog, like a belfry
horribly ruined forever
that retraced ash.
It's late. However I would
all oaths and rainfall
walls with insults and mimes,
windows winter, the sea sometimes
for not having your heart in me, your heart

inevitable and painful to me that sobreviviéndote
am entirely alone.

Difference Betweed Retro Jordan And Originals

Titolo: Super size me

DURATION: 96 minuts

ANY NACIONALITAT i: i Alemanya
Mongolia, 2003
DIRECTOR: Morgan Spurlock

actors and actresses:
Morgan Spurlock, Ronald McDonald, Dr.. Daryl Isaacs, Dr.. Lisa Ganjhu, Alexandra Jamieson, Dr.. Stephen Siegel, Bridget Bennett, Eric Rowley, John Banzhaf, John Robbins
SCRIPT: Morgan Spurlock

PRODUCTION: Morgan Spurlock

MUSIC: Steve Horowitz and Michael Parrish

PHOTOGRAPHY: Scott Ambrozy

EDITING:
Stela Georgieva and Julie " Bob "Lombardi
ART DIRECTION: Joe the Artist
Morgan Spurlock, director of advertising and TV programs, 33, is the protagonist of his own documentary about the fast food industry. For a month (30 days) made three meals -Daily breakfast, lunch and dinner at McDonald's establishments. He traveled to U.S. customers talking with McDonald's establishments and health experts from 20 American cities. Report obesity and portrays a known aspect of American life ... and not American.
Half of diseases that cause more deaths worldwide are closely linked to food. Overfeeding and malnutrition are the two most visible faces of the food deficits that coexist on the planet. The lack of excess food is the source of epidemics as serious, according to experts in community nutrition, should play places priority on the agendas of those responsible for public health on a par with smoking. They claim they need community programs and global actions, and so raise the First World Congress of Nutrition and Public Health to be held in Barcelona later this month. While rich countries
obesity figures reaching terrifying (Spain 16 100 people are obese), in developing societies there is a doubly alarming phenomenon: the coexistence of malnutrition due to lack of food with a increase in obesity caused by the abandonment of traditional products and adoption of a diet on cheap food and poor quality, but very rich in calories. Quickly
McDonald's introduced vegetarian sandwiches, salads and a selection of super size withdrew.

CONTEST
The script of the film came to Morgan Spurlock knew that TV had two sisters sued McDonald's, which blamed their obesity. The ruling said that the girls could not prove that McDonald's was the only culprit of their obesity.
think we have enough elements to say that fast food is bad?
How to avoid the consumption of such food in a world like today? To what extent companies are responsible? Where responsibility begins and where the company of people?
Some media and businesses have said that a documentary is very exaggerated because there is nobody to make three meals a day and in places, but there are many people, without exaggeration, about 90 meals a year in places similar effect is the same.

Why would you say that in some forums instead of talking about talking about fast food junk food?

We can speak of a trend of world population or directly from an epidemic?
If we compare what is denounced in the film with the figures of malnutrition in certain countries and continents, it seems a little obscene paradox?

Why McDonald's?
was chosen for several reasons:
has more than 30,000 restaurants in over 100 countries.
serves over 46 million people a day.
has a very sophisticated strategy to attract customers ahead of the children.
is not the only place like this, their close relatives are: Burger King, Pizza Hut, KFC and other such ... ....

think in some sense that MacDonald's is an emblem with regard to fast food?

The same year McDonald's spent 500 million dollars in his campaign WeLove to See You Smile, the government invested 2 million in nutrition education. You get

consequences of this imbalance?
recall what were the results of the first review?

bodily changes observed after the experiment

Morgan Spurlock's diet before




Weight 83 kg
Cholesterol
165
Analytical Analytical
correct within the limits of normality


After diet

Weight

Cholesterol


Analytical decompensated. Liver swollen
Other symptoms Pressie
high respiratoris problemes, bad chap, vomiting win, depressio, Perdue l'sexual appetite.

1996 Dutchman 16ft Travel Trailer

Size 4 º ESO

Undoubtedly one of the masterpieces of the horror film is Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho. Not just blood, Hitchcock wrote the most disturbing murder of film history. Shot in black and white to achieve a more sinister, the story begins as a black movie film to turn sharply to a horror story that puts on one of the first psychopaths in movie history.

But we are interested in psychosis as a visual material that will usher in psychological and philosophical issues of interest. The director Alfred Hitchcock in his films was given to propose many of the themes of psychoanalytic theory. Psychosis is why allow us to enter more directly in some of the concepts of Psychoanalysis.

And as the film is a pretext for reflection, with the help of psychosis will go to the literature to analyze one of the many issues that the film suggests, the theme of the double. The work chosen for this study is the RL Stevenson novel The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.

And regardless of psychoanalytic plateamientos with psychosis can understand more complex world of mental illness.




TASK
To reflect in the text everything you will learn with film and the novel I propose the following exercise. Please read this letter and answer it in a minute. You see many of the issues that she raised you can solve studying, analyzing or just reading the documents at your disposal in this web. That is why the exercise is a synthetic activity that will allow the teacher and yourself or know everything that you have assimilated. Be careful / a in the development of exercise.


Dear friend / a: For too long we leave the healthy habit of writing. I still remember that period of our life that did not happen one month without receiving your letter, letter was immediately answered by me, without any impairment of task time or stand in our pleasant activity. We talked about everything and any daily anecdote was an excellent pretext for a long conversation. And I insist the conversation, because for me it was your cards, long, lengthy dialogues with us about everything human and divine, and truly those dialogues always served to clarify my thoughts and test them with you.

I be me again resumed the custom unreasonably interrupted. And I'm talking to you about making a movie that you've probably seen more than one occasion and I hope you will read a book. I know you're good fans and connoisseurs of the great works of classic cinema and you will like my proposal.

film I want to talk (and especially to ask) is Hitchcock's Psycho. I know a good film is an open text, which conveys different messages, depending on when we see it. That's why everything I say the film, let me guess when you are in and serve as a vehicle of communication between us.

Have you ever thought the film genre it belongs to psychosis? Everyone knows that it has passed into history as a classic film of terror, but do not you think there are other components in that movie? Why I would like to begin by commenting on the different readings that can be made of the película.Ya know that Hitchcock used to distinguish between the true plot of the film and what he called the McGuffin. Did you understand what the McGuffin?

is clear that the character of Norman Bates becomes the center of the action and of course wanted to tell me about it, but I'm also interested in the other characters who accompany him. What I say, for example, Marion , the hypocrite who, without a clear justification steals $ 40,000, which are about seven million years 60? Why Marion steals? Naturally I want you to stop over analyzing everything to Norman Bates and his mother. I imagine you'll agree with me that, although not shown in the film, the mother is a central character can say many things through the child.

Obviously the history of Norman Bates is not only telling us the film, but the dark past that appears in the story of two ways, through the final interpretation of the psychiatrist and the hidden details of the mansion teaches us . It tells us that mansion in the life of the characters I would also like to talk to me, and hobbies of Norman Bates. Do you think it fits the character his fondness for taxidermy?

know that Hitchcock has been criticized at times plays with the audience to conceal material information about the story. It is clear that in this film that does not. So I'd like to be discussed at what point in the movie and why we know that Norman Bates is mentally ill. It is clear that the character of Norman Bates is defined much more by making what he says. However, there is a very interesting conversation that I wish it told me. I mean the one with Marion in the room where he keeps his stuffed birds. I think that conversation portrays very well the nature of their conflicts and contradictions, which is why I would like interpret it with me and let me cuidado.Fíjate also other details that show the mental illness of Norman Bates.
As you remember at the end of the adventure film interpretation psychiatrist's Disease Norman Bates in the light of psychoanalytic approaches. Undoubtedly with the data that it have the proposed theory fits quite well. I would also like to know your opinion. Of course not only psychoanalysis can clarify something the Bates case, because as you know the light of current psychiatry says of delirium and hallucinations can also understand your problem well. I send you a text psychiatrist recent Cordoba Carlos Castilla del Pino I wish it applied to the case of Norman. And of course he also told me something about the madness of Don Quixote.
And, of course, would also like to know your opinion about the effects that Hitchcock has produced in you with this film. You know it was a great connoisseur of the springs that move the viewer and used with great talent. What do you think of the times when it comes to stress subliminar to get some idea?
I would like to know also what is the climax of the film. I'll tell you that I especially like all the way from Marion to the hotel. Feel that escapes from danger to get to another, if be greater, notes that the nature of this anguish in tune with Marion (those headlights that sweep across the face of Marion, the rain that hits on the glass, the same face of Marion, and announcements of local road all this tells us what's coming.) Coméntame what your time and why.

really a good film always leads beyond itself. So does psychosis, which certainly can be considered consistent with the Gothic. How about this beauty? Perhaps, as you are much younger than I, may offer a new perspective on this strange sensitivity with which some young people today are identified.
And as I said there is also a novel that the movie can be a parent. I refer to the work of RLStevenson, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The work has been interpreted in multiple ways: as a philosophical novel, which reflects its dual nature and even multiforme of the human being as a moral fable that reflects on the moral hypocrisy, the perverse effects of moral puritanism, the responsibility of man of all its acts, a science fiction novel that warns against the negative effects of scientific experimentation. I would like to test your ability to analyze, for which I propose that I comment on each of these interpretations and I select a paragraph or chapter to prove the validity of that interpretation.
I wonder if the work had been written in the XXI Century which details have changed. Could you list each and every one of the aspects that should be reviewed on a novel of the century?.

And of course the most interesting, no doubt in your reflection is that compare both cases, the Norman Bates and Dr. Jekyll.
I look forward to your reply. Hopefully the film again return us!

PROCESS AND RESOURCES

course to answer the letter you have to watch the movie and read the novel. Then you will to make a first phase of collecting information about all the questions that will make your friend in the letter. The questions cover the following topics.
film analysis. The house as a character in the film.
resources used by Hitchcock: The McGuffiny the use of subliminal effects. psychoanalytic interpretations of psychosis.
mental illness Norman Bates: On the general concept of mental illness on hallucinations and delusions. Do you have something in common Don Quixote Norman Bates?
http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/averroes/centros-tic/14002984/helvia/aula/archivos/repositorio//1500/1507/html/webfilosofia/psicosis/principal.htm

The final explanation of Simon, the psychiatrist on the case of Norman Bates.
- District Attorney: Have you heard? - Simon: No. I know the whole story. But not Norman. I know her by her mother. Norman Bates no longer exists. There was only half theirs. Now the other half will dominate. Probably forever.
-Lila: He killed my sister?
- Simon: Yes .. and not
- District Attorney: If you like Simon seeks to establish a medical basis to support the defense of this guy just ...
- Simon: The Simon does not make fundamentals, just try to explain ...
- Lila: But yeah ... my sister?
- Simon: Yes I'm sorry. And also the private detective. If they dredge that swamp next to the inn, perhaps ... Are there any unresolved missing persons case?
- Chief of Police: Yes, two.
- Simon: Girls?
- Chief of Police: Does he have confessed? - Simon: I said that was the mother. But to understand how the mother may have confessed, that is half mental Norman dominates, we must go back ten years. A when he killed his mother and the man who lived with her. Then it was already quite disturbed. It was since his father died. His mother was authoritative, a woman absorbent. For years they lived as if nobody else existed. She met a man. Norma felt that this friendship will not delay. And in a fit of jealousy killed the two. Matricide is probably the most monstrous crime that exists. And whoever commits it becomes negligible. So he tried to erase this crime, at least in his mind. And stole the corpse. Ballast is buried a coffin. He hid the body in his home. And tried to keep it as best he could. But that was not enough. While she was there was nothing but a corpse. And then he began to feel and speak for her. Gave half of his life, so to speak. Sometimes holding both personalities and holding conversations and other Sometimes he dominated the maternal half. Norman was never fully. But often it was entirely his mother. Always was pathologically jealous of her and she thought it was so that once felt a strong attraction to a woman his mother's side rampaged. When she met her sister, she was attracted, excited, wanted it. This aroused the maternal jealousy. And the mother killed her. After killing her for Norman was as if waking from a dream. And with the submission of a child took away the traces of that crime he was convinced he had committed his mother. - Sam: Why was dressed like that?
- District Attorney: Is transformed
- Simon: No not that. Transformer is the person who intends to distract or get dramatic effects wearing different clothes. Therefore, Norman is not. He was dressed that way because it helped to preserve the illusion that his mother was still alive. And when the reality was close, when danger or desire would destroy his dream, he disguised himself, put on even a wig, walked, used the chair for her, imitating her voice, she would be his mother understand? And now, now it is. So at the beginning said that his mother told me the story. In any case that the mind holds two personalities, there is a conflict, a battle. In Norman, gentlemen, the battle ended. The dominant personality has won.
- Chambers: The forty thousand dollars. Where are they?
- Simon: In the swamp. Were crimes of passion, not profit.
- Police: He says he is cold would you wear this blanket?
- Simon: Okay.
- Norman: Thank you.
Mother of Norman.

voiceover is very sad that a mother has to testify against his own son. I could not let him believe that the crime I committed myself. Now I will lock. I should do it myself for years. It was always an evil. Trying to make myself believe that he had killed those girls and that man. As if I could do anything except sit and watch Like his stuffed birds. They know that I can not move a finger. I do not want. I'll be sitting here. I will not make a single move. Suspect me. I'll probably watch. To monitor. So they will realize the kind of person I am. I will not kill you (looking at a fly in his hand). Relax. Sure I'm being watched. Better. Just say, "but was unable either to kill a fly ..."

·
comment explaining Simon (the psychiatrist) to the case of Norman Bates from what you've learned about psychoanalysis.

Leather Bracelets Disneyland Sizes

me Psycho.

Lee and make the following activities:
a) summary of the main ideas
b) Women in Franco. Investigate the treatment he received and the laws governing regarding the role of women in the time of Franco. Make a critical assessment

"Home economics teachers for high school and" 1958

• Be prepared a delicious meal for when he returns from work. Especially his favorite dish. Offer to take off his shoes. Speak in a low tone, relaxed and enjoyable.
• Prepare: retouch your makeup, put a ribbon in your hair. Become a little more interesting for him. His hard work day may need a little encouragement, and one of your duties is provided.
• During the coldest days you should prepare and light a fire in the fireplace for him to relax in front of him. After all, worry about his comfort will provide you with immense personal satisfaction.
• Minimize any noise. At the time of his arrival, eliminate hum washer or vacuum cleaner. Greet him with a warm smile and show your desire to please. Listen to him, let him talk first, remember his topics of conversation are more important than yours. Never complain if he is late, or out to dinner or other places of entertainment without you. Try instead to understand his world of strain and stress, and their actual needs. Make them feel comfortable, to rest in a comfortable chair or lie down in the bedroom. Have ready a hot or cold drink for him. Do not ask for explanations about their actions or their trial or integrity issues. Remember it is the master of the house.
• Encourage your husband to put their hobbies and interests and serve to support without being too pushy. If you have any hobbies, try not to bore you by talking about it, because the interests of women are trivial compared to men. By late afternoon, cleaning the house is clean again in the morning. Provides for the needs that will be breakfast time. The breakfast is vital for your husband if you must face the inner world with positive mood.
• Once you have removed both of you to the room, get ready for bed as soon as possible, taking into account that while the feminine hygiene is of utmost importance, your husband does not want to wait to go to the bathroom. You must look unbeatable at the time of going to bed ... if you should apply face cream or hair rollers, wait until he is asleep, because that would be shocking to a man late at night. As regards the possibility of intimate relations with your husband, it is important to remember your obligations of marriage, if he feels the need sleeping, so be it, do not pressure or encourage intimacy. If your husband suggests the union, then agree humbly, always bearing in mind that your satisfaction is more important than a woman. When you reach the climax, a small moan of you is enough to indicate any enjoyment that you have experienced. If your husband asked you to unusual sexual practices, be obedient and do not complain. It is likely that your husband falls into a deep sleep then, so get comfortable clothes, cool off and apply your night cream and facial for your hair products. You can then set the alarm to get up a little before him in the morning. This will allow have ready a cup of tea when I wake.

Gift Card Wording Invitation

Women Franco


GOLD BARS




Alapont, Pasqual




Alex's life is at a dead end. After a motorcycle accident, his girlfriend has died, and for him and nothing matters. In these circumstances meets Nuria, a young woman who belongs to an association of friends of Egypt. The contact with people open to Alexander a new world, but also gradually causes the network in an esoteric where their lives may be endangered. In the same way that Martha Hell, this novel PASQUAL Alapont is complemented with an interesting popularizer text. The journalist Pepe Rodriguez, a specialist in the world of cults, shows the internal mechanisms are hidden behind a destructive cult. A work that successfully combines a gripping novel and useful study.

After reading the text answer the following questions: Why 1_
Alexandre is a person vulnerable to being captured by a cult. 2_
explains the method of recruitment of followers of the sect Papyrus through the case of Alexander. 3_
What is the apparent purpose of the sect and what the real purpose? Compare what Alex thought the beginning was the sect and eventually discover what it is.
4_ The attitude of the parents of Alexandre Do you think appropriate? Do you think you are partly responsible for the fall in the sect? How do you think should have acted? 5_
Write an end of the book from the time that remains. At least 20 lines. 6_
explains some of the techniques used to override the will of the followers.
7_ Of the sects we studied in class, to which you think is more like?
8_ There are features that define a dangerous cult by Pepe Rodriguez, and come in the final appendix of the book. Look in the book elements that show that these features are met in the sect Papyrus.

Isopure With Creatine

4 º ESO golden bars

Totem and Taboo Freud

ethnological data collected most important of his time and concluded that the t
Oteman
is the oldest and most universal religious. Also draws inspiration from the writings of Darwin, is that primitive man lived in small hordes dominated by a powerful male, master of all females. The situation of male offspring was hard, if aroused the suspicions of the father were killed or banished, were condemned to live in small communities and in achieving abducted females. Sexual impulses of the sons and brothers were heading toward his mother and sisters but, as happens in the child, the great obstacles to his wishes was the father. The situation aroused a feeling of hatred and death to him, a desire to eliminate him and take his place. What happened to us makes clear Freud in his Totem and Taboo:

"The Darwinian theory is the existence of a violent and jealous father who reserves for himself all expelled females and their children as they grow. [...] The expelled brothers met one day, the father killed and ate his body and put an end to the existence of the father horde. United held that, individually, would not have been possible. Since they were cannibals was natural that devoured the corpse. The totem feast, perhaps the first feast of humanity, reproduction would be commemorating this memorable and criminal act, which was the starting point for the social, moral restrictions and of religion. "

What happened after the assassination of his father? On the one hand, Freud continues, the country experienced a long period of social disorder in which the brothers were fighting and paternal succession in which each sought to occupy the coveted post, but the reality principle and the brothers won realized that to survive we had to suppress the mobile home of parricide, the possession of females. On the other hand, there was a strong conscience or guilt because of the ambivalent feelings, hatred and love for the father.
The principle of reality and guilt are what gave birth to the social, moral and religious standards, in particular the totemic religion. Thus, for the good of all it became necessary to abandon the ideal of imitating his father in the possession of the mother and sisters, need that resulted in their first moral standards: a.

incest taboo, namely, the horror and the prohibition of having sexual relationship with family and
b.
the precept of exogamy
, the obligation to find a husband or wife outside their own group.
The desire to soften the remorse caused the primitive animal serve as a strong and feared, the totem of the community to replace the father. The above two rules together with the following form the core of religion totemic
c. the prohibition against killing the totem animal representing the murdered father.
The totem feast and remember the original parricide committed the participants to maintain the established order. Freud believed that the assassination of the father has been played historically, the Jews murdered Moses hypothesis formulated in Moses and Monotheism, and then killed Jesus.

In Totem and Taboo, Freud suspected of violence in the origin of their social institutions, morals and religion. In the 1927 book, The Future of an Illusion, talks about society and religion not so much from an ethnological perspective and from a psychological perspective. Continues his analogy between individual phenomena and collective phenomena by comparing the behavior of neurotic with religious rites, in all the figure of the father, the patriarch as deified in Judaism, is once again the key explanatory element. The deep sense of helplessness that we all experience in our childhood and who also experienced the human family in the early time was what sparked the need for loving care. In our childhood, our father meets this need, the elderly, helpless, helpless, recalls with nostalgia the protection they enjoyed as a child and, projecting it creates the illusion of the existence of a God father and protector.

Freud argued that religious ideas are illusions
, embodiments of the oldest and most intense desires of humanity. What desires? The desires that every man has at his helplessness, to be protected from the dangers of life, for justice in society, that human existence does not end with death. Still emphasizing the great services with great efficiency religion has offered to humanity throughout its history. Meet deep human needs, has made happiness more accessible to man. The man can only give religion the day his mental life is subject to the dictatorship of reason, if you leave the religion without having taken a truly moral, then you will get nothing. 1_



Explains concepts in bold
2_Analiza the origin of religion throughout the book and the similarities that appear between the totemic religion and Christianity.
3 - The subject that we have related the book is the crisis of the Enlightenment and the philosophies of suspicion. Freud reminds us that not only reason which can explain and govern our lives. There are also unconscious elements very difficult to control and to understand rationally. Make a review of these items throughout the book Totem and Taboo.

Is Aleve Good For Anxiety

Book 1, Bach. Totem and Taboo

Like Water for Chocolate
http://www.librosgratisweb.com/html/esquivel-laura/como-agua-para-chocolate/index.htm (here you can read free) Like Water for Chocolate is the novel by Laura Esquivel

, published in 1989

, speaking about the love affair between a woman (Tita) and his family. 1_
Social norms indicated that the last child of a woman should devote his life to meet his mother, Tita was so completely dedicated to family service and forget the love, because he was the youngest daughter. To prevent your daughter follow in love with Pedro, decides to marry him to his sister. Pedro marries Rosaura, although I felt no love for him. Explain these traditions and the meaning they have about discrimination of women. Scores are also other things to observe about this discrimination in the book.
2. Why is the kitchen important?
3. How does the influence of other cultures in this movie?
4. The film reflects the historical events for the Mexican people. What are they? How represented in the film?
5. What deeper meaning are the recipes? 6_

explains the theory of matches. Explains its metaphorical meaning.

"While we are all born with a box of matches inside us, we can not turn alone, we need [...]

oxygen and the help of a candle. Only in this case the oxygen has to come by example, the breath of the beloved, the candle can be any type of food, music

[...] you do shoot the detonator and thus turn one of the matches. [...] Each person must discover what are the triggers for a living. [...] If one does not discover

time what their triggers, the box of matches and gets wet and can never light a single match. "" Of course you also have to be very careful to go lighting matches one by one. For if by a strong emotion is coming to light all in one fell swoop [...] before our eyes see a splendid tunnel we shows the way we forgot at birth and calls us to rediscover our divine origin "1
1John Brown, pg. 85