TRUTH OPENS STEP ON WILD IN CRIMINAL CHORRILLOS REQUISITION Rigoberto Garcia psychosocial Seizes
http://idl-reporteros.pe/2010/08/12/requisa-psicosocial/ For
Paola Ugaz few weeks ago, 24 last June, conducted a seizure of high-profile - with the director and deputy director of INPE, in the Annex to Santa Monica Criminal Chorrillos. The purpose media became apparent when in full registration was distributed to the eager reportorial mass called out several short videos and pictures of what was happening inside the prison.
The requisition, which was made with a strong mobilization of the Special Operations Group INPE, reinforced by a substantial contingent of the Counter-Terrorism (Dircote) of the PNP, and also the presence of three prosecutors, ended without was found anything of importance with regard to security issues, either internally or externally. At least that is what is known so far, as part of the seized material remained sealed in the Second Office of Terrorism Supraprovincial last IDL-Reporters asked him.
In fact, all the noise of the requisition, was followed by an awkward silence from the authorities, particularly prosecutors and, surprisingly, the Ombudsman, who seem to want to talk as little as possible on the subject.
Throughout this process, has been one significant sanction: the dismissal of the warden, Gloria Estrada, along with others on your team.
Since then, at least one publication of "The Trade "and to a lesser degree in" Panorama ", it was shown that the reasons, timing and above all the fanfare of the requisition, were so many parts of a farce. It was shown, for example, that the parole request Maritza Garrido Lecca was denied by the authorities of the Penal Santa Monica two weeks before the search.
But what has not been revealed yet is that during the search, despite the presence of prosecutors, the vagina was dug more than a dozen hikers and common prisoners in humiliating conditions unequivocally. The purpose seems to have been none other than the humiliation of the prisoners. The only reason given by the authorities has been to regain a supposedly lost "principle of authority." They do not explain, however, how to retrieve this principle, should have lost, humiliating the prisoners.
requisitioning Pavilion B started at 5.25 pm on Thursday 24 June. In this hall there are 77 inmates, of whom 42 were sentenced walkers. At this time in Hall B broke, dozens of officials and police-INPE Goes the Dircote, men and women.
The first zone was recorded at the third floor, home to the walkers. No sooner had initiated the requisition, it is immediately disrupted with the announcement of vaginal examinations. "I was the first internal to which he made this type of review, says Maritza Garrido Lecca, "and the incredible thing is that complain to the prosecutor ignored me and told the staff of INPE-Goes: Act, act, act." Garrido Lecca
hurgada internally maintains that it was three times without care for and against male police located in the bars of his cell.
None of that appeared in the videos that Inpe distributed to journalists, but the protests can be heard shouting for the "humiliating and degrading revisions." (See video from INPE in http://idl-reporteros.pe/ 2010/08/12/requisa-psicosocial /).
While this was happening, came as several witnesses, the nurse from the prison on the third floor, after being called by the INPE, but seeing the scene refused to review a Garrido Lecca and retired.
Another inmate, Edith Espinoza Montano, an internal B wing walker, said officials of both sexes criminal forcibly stripped him and "reviewed" the vagina before a prosecutor, inviting staff criminal act.
On the third floor, rummaged through the vagina of several other detainees, coincidentally among younger women. Both Maruja Chavez Arango, Miriam Espino Salinas Espinoza Yohany Vinces, Córdoba Carolina Alzamora, Marisol Vallejo Sara Venturo Ríos Vásquez, claim to have gone through this event.
But not only was revised to walkers. After midnight, the INPE staff reviewed several of the common prisoners of the second and first floor.
All were asked to drop their internal pantalones.Una who asked not be named, said IDL-Reporters that "at midnight we were down to the courtyard and then forced us to lower the bathing suit. It was very humiliating because under these conditions we did 'ranear' in the backyard. "
Why was that? Certainly there are circumstances in which it is necessary to make revisions intimate (although, for example, the suspected "mules" for drug trafficking and to bring within the body subjected to X-rays). Moreover, even if you do not have the means to x-ray of an inmate, intimate revisions must be made in suitable environments (for example, in this case, the nurse who is on the first floor) and appropriate staff of the same sex and with necessary hygienic conditions. All that could be done that day, and not done. Why? IDL-
Reporters asked about it to the Minister of Justice Víctor García Toma. "There was a request for requisition since the beginning of the year to Chorrillos," Garcia said Toma, "but I, on principle, I did not know the date ... I learned about the requisition by the incident that occurred ... I called Rodriguez Rabanal, indicating that Maritza Garrido Lecca was introduced a chip in the vagina. " Garcia Takes
decided to come forward immediately a forensic physician. "We called the medical examiner" he says, "but I do not know if it came before or after vaginal examinations or revised more than vaginally ... must be a police report." IDL-
Reporters repeatedly asked the public prosecutor access to minutes of the requisition. Until the time of this writing, have refused to provide it (see the Ministry's Public http://idl-reporteros.pe/2010/08/12/requisa-psicosocial/ .) The medical examiner
Silvia Ganoza Ching received, about eight in the evening, a call asking "vaginal support." Other people might have been confused about the nature of such support, but the medical examiner knew what it was, since it was formed immediately to prison. The book income
records that arrived at 8.37 pm and left at 9.55 pm. But the medical examiner did not enter the Hall B.
"We have not made any test," says Silvia Ganoza, "I have not made any vaginal examination. They requested support from the medical examiner to vaginal support [sic] but not carried out, because when it was the inmates no longer wanted to take the exam ... I medical examiner, Dr. Silvia Ching, I have not done any revision. "
Why was it then? "The prosecutor in charge," said Gano, "requests a coroner because there had been, I do not say names, a person who had inserted an object into the vagina. Then we arrived, just imagine that he was in distress, I figured it was a bigger thing. Then when I get tell me that the incident was over. Even asked if someone said they wanted to be evaluated, and they told me there was nothing new. " The medical examiner
returned at midnight and was filling out paperwork, providing more support chart, until dawn. Inpe
president, Ruben Rodriguez Rabanal, which remained outside the pavilion, says the following about intimate reviews: "This work was undertaken at the request of the police and public prosecutors who were present and that is why we contacted with the Attorney General's Office and the medical examiners were present. " When he notes that the medical examiner was not present in the reviews, Rodriguez Rabanal said: "The hours do not use, the time came I could not answer whether it was 8.35 pm. If you have I do not know this information came from, but I guess that comes from the income of those people. " (See transcription of key excerpts from an interview with Rodriguez Rabanal. Http://idl-reporteros.pe/2010/08/12/requisa-psicosocial/ Listen to the audio.)
On the same subject, IDL-Reporters interviewed the former president of INPE, Wilfredo Pedraza, who noted that "close review is governed by the rules of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Is covered in Chapter III "(See document http://idl-reporteros.pe/2010/08/12/requisa-psicosocial/). About
requisition procedures and intimate reviews for those, IDL-Reporters asked experts in the prison system, including several presidents of INPE. See interview
Wilfredo Pedraza, Gustavo Carrión Interview, Interview with Leonardo Caparrós in http://idl-reporteros.pe/2010/08/12/requisa-psicosocial/
During the operation, the warden, Gloria Estrada was isolated by his superiors and asked not to enter a requisition. Then, several industry officials indicate that a key reason why they took out this action was to "restore the principle of authority" supposedly relaxed and lost by Estrada.
"There were problems with the Principal" Justice Minister says Garcia Takes, "by excessive horizontalization [sic] of the relationship with the inmates." Rodriguez Rabanal is expressed in a similar way (see interview) (listen audio http://idl-reporteros.pe/2010/08/12/requisa-psicosocial/).
But the evidence that has IDL-Reporters points rather to the management of Estrada had been applauded by the authorities to maintain peace in the prison and achieve success in the educational process of rehabilitation.
The following video, a visit to the prison in the congressmen Cuculiza and Pérez del Solar, is shown (see video http://idl-reporteros.pe/2010/08/12/requisa-psicosocial/
).
Not only that. Rodriguez Rabanal applauded himself shortly before managing director and commended to all in a lively fashion show attended by no great fear of "horizontal."
Is it the "horizontal" [sic] a sin or a defect in prison policy? The following interviews with experts and human rights activists raised diverging views clearly and Rodriguez Garcia Takes Rabanal (if they coincide with the expressions of it in the fashion show by the Women's Day).
See what he says Rocío Silva Santisteban
And Wilfredo Pedraza http://idl-reporteros.pe/2010/08/12/requisa-psicosocial/ Rodriguez Rabanal
"contradicts itself? Clearly yes. So the only explanation is that the requisition has not had anything to do with the art or science and other prison rather a lot with the craftsmanship of the psychosocial.
